Website Definitions:


This website wil be closed from 15 October 2017

My new website is 

Natural Law Matters

Found here

* * * * * 

This page is presently under review.

Definitions and meanings described here are those used on this website, which postulates a future symbiotic society adhering to the principles of natural law, the Constitution of Man, its Declaration of Individual Rights, secured by a Commission of Justice. Definitions and meanings, herein, belong in that future paradigm, although some are applicable today. In broad terms, differences are most clearly apparent once the differences between natural law and positive law, and between independent living beings (ILB) and (legal) persons are understood.

Caution is advised: Description at the foot of this page… 

Natural law: Natural law is the order of human world, if it is not simply the orderliness of independent living human beings, (ILB’s) This website postulates that natural law springs from orderliness within Mans mental and bodily process, manifesting outwardly in his actions and conduct, so as to preserve like orderliness and harmony in a convivial, cooperative society.   

Natural law is the natural order of conviviality of independent living human beings, (ILB’s). It is is divorced from any artificial order.  (say, the order of kings, queens, knights, pawns, etcetera in the 'social system' of chess, or the order of presidents, members of the cabinet, secretaries of state, MP's, or citizens in the 'game' of some State). Exactly as the physical universe is not a collection of theories of physics, so natural law is not a collection of law theories.

Natural justice: This website discounts the commonly expressed meaning that ‘natural justice concerns procedural fairness to ensure a fair decision is reached by an objective decision maker.’ Such meaning is vacant and belittles the concept of ‘natural’ and what is ‘just.’ Just–ness is of nature, always, irrespective of Mans decisions and choices. Respect nature, and natural justice rewards. Disrespect nature and natural justice penalises its perpetrators and others. Mans mental and emotional faculties abide natural justice identically. Apathetically choose not to learn, and natural justice serves ignorance. Learn to programme subconscious mind and natural justice serves wisdom. Nothing can be more simple.

Individual Rights: Rights pertaining to single, separate,independent living human beings, (ILB’s), to the exclusion of any and all ‘Group Rights.’  (See Article 2)

Declaration of Independent Rights:

Refer to the Constitution of Man, and to the supplementary notes.

Commission of Justice The 'Commission of Justice' (CoJ) is a body of people 'commissioned' by Man to ensure that the ‘natural domicil and justice of man' is preserved in the locality of their abode. Intentioned to replace Government, its purpose is to protect and uphold Unalienable and Inalienable  Rights, to arrest harm initiated by others and to adjudicate remedial amends, restoration, recompense, restitution and reparation, justly. Such Commission is forbidden the drafting, implementation or enforcement of any laws, any initiated violence, mental or physical.

Convivial Order: Convivial, is from the Latin convivere, to live together. A convivial order is not a society.  It is a catallaxy, an order of friendly exchange among independent living beings (ILB's). Examples of convivial order in daily life include  friendly relations among friends and neighbors, among travelers and local people, and among buyers and sellers on open markets.  Convivial order exists  wherever people meet and mingle and to do business, irrespective of whether or not they belong to the same or any social organisation. They have no need to be aware of each other’s social affiliation or position, or of any teleocratic or nomocratic regulations that might be imposed by some society or other. Convivial order is most conducive to ILB’s because both adhere to natural jurisdiction, without interference. 

Praxeology: Praxeology is the deductive study of human action derived from the premise that humans engage in purposeful behavior, as opposed to reflexive behavior like sneezing and inanimate behavior. Beginning with the action axiom, conclusions may be drawn about human behavior that are both objective and universal.

Unalienable Rights: Man’s immutable and inviolable right to act in support of his life.  Unalienable Rights are defined in proper context in the Constitution of Man, and in Unalienable Rights.

Inalienable Rights: Man’s right to the product of his actions, whence an object of one’s property may be liened, but the right to own property is immutable and inviolable, not lien-able.   Inalienable Rights are defined in proper context in the Constitution of Man, in accordance with the Constitution Notes, and described in Inalienable Rights.

Independent Living Being (ILB): A flesh and blood human being living in the private natural domain of Creator’s endowments, lawful rights, and natural laws, independent from, and rebutting/refusing interference from, all other imposing jurisdictions, save by express, willful consent.

ILB Code: Alpha-numeric Code, developed from attributes of a flesh and blood, living human being, at the instant of its first breath, which biological data certifies that the being lives, free and independent from any dead ‘legal entity,’ fictionally construed in the ILB’s name.  

Encrypted Property Code:  Alpha-numeric Code, encrypted from the ILB code, certifying that property to which it is attached, e.g. car, boat, surfboard, belongs exclusively to that ILB, free and independent of any construed legal, or equitable title.

Security Code: Numeric Code, automatically generated by a computer algorithm from both the Encrypted Property Code and the ILB Code, such that theft or fraudulent mis-use of either is immediately detected. 

Private Declaration of Independence: Declaration of Independence made by a flesh and blood Independent Living Being, ILB, of their Creator endowed  ILB status and Rights in the “Private” natural jurisdiction; free and independent from “Public,” Legal jurisdiction, any and all trespass forbidden without express consent following full disclosure. 

Domicil:  Original jurisdiction of Source, Laws of creation - used contextually in the nature of 'BEing’. 

Domicile: Man made jurisdiction, private corporation jurisdiction operating under guise of government and the management of its capital, human or otherwise, i.e, if it is value owned by private corporation operating under the guise of government, or any branch franchise department thereof, then it is "domicile") 

The One People: (Abbreviation - ‘People' ) All individual men and women are created equal by their Creator, which according to the nature of being Man, qua Man, is unequivocally the Unalienable Right to Life permitting no trespass. Since all beings are equal, all men and women are "One People" in the aggregate sense; not as a (societal)  ‘collective.’

Common law:  The body of law developed in England primarily from judicial decisions based on custom and precedent, unwritten in statute or code, and constituting the basis of the English legal system and of the system in all of the United States except Louisiana. 

William Blackstone wrote in his Commentaries on the Laws of England (1756), that common law was: 

"... to be found in the records of our several courts of justice in books of reports and judicial decisions, and in treastises of learned sages of the profession, prescribed and handed down to us from the times of ancient antiquity. They are the laws which gave rise and origin to that collection of maxims and customs which is now known by the name of common law."

Because it is not written by elected politicians but, rather, by judges, it is also referred to as unwritten law or lex non scripta. Judges seek out those principles when trying a case and apply the precedents to the facts to come up with a judgment. (Note that ‘lex’ refers to positive law; ‘ius’ refers to natural law.) 

Common law is often equated with natural law because both are unwritten in statute or code. This misses the point that Common law is based on judicial decisions based on custom and precedent. Natural law, by contrast is objectively based on the nature of Man, his orderliness of being and conduct. Thus common law falls within the jurisdiction of ‘legal positivism,’ (lex) whilst natural law falls within ‘natural jurisdiction,’ (ius). Notwithstanding, they remain closely allied.  

Legal Positivism: Man-made law, posited by Man, for Man. Positivism is a school of Jurisprudence founded on the belief that the only legitimate sources of law are those written rules, regulations, expressly enacted, adopted, legislated and enforced by a government body, including administrative, executive, legislative, and judicial bodies. Legal rules are premised valid because they are enacted by (purported) legitimate authority and are accepted by the society as such.

Positive law: The elemental foundation of all legal systems, derived from legal positivism, embracing  such as its legislative, executive, administrative, judiciary, military and police, its offices and officers, the rules they invent and apply, decisions and enforcements they make. Generally exclusive of natural law or justice, positive law defines and enforces what is legal in a particular society, not what is lawful among human beings. The concept of 'positive law’, is that of an artificial order—an order of artificial persons.

Individual: A single human being as distinct from a group: Within the natural realm, single, separate, independent of any legalities of ‘personage,’ or those construed as belonging to a ‘natural person.’  The word ‘individual’ on this website utterly rejects that ‘Individual’ means a ‘Natural Person,’ exactly as Individual rights apply to ILB’s which rejects the legal jurisdiction. Likewise, articles 1.2.1 and 1.8.1 denies the phrase, ‘individual living being,’ from meaning any other than an ‘Independent Living Being. ILB.’  

IMPORTANT NOTE 3: In the Australian Interpretations Act (1901), ‘Individual’ means a ‘Natural Person’ 

Natural person: Two opposing definitions exist.  

1 Within ‘legal positivism,’ one who has consented, or without their knowledge and consent is deemed or construed to act in the legal jurisdiction, I.e. as a legal person"Person" and "Citizen" have been corrupted by ‘legalese,’ not to describe, but deemed or construed in meaning so as to co-join a living (flesh and blood) human being with a body politic and body corporate, (formal name for a corporation). In the Australian Interpretations Act (1901) ‘Natural Person,‘ mean this combination exactly, and ‘Individual’ means a ‘Natural Person‘. Effectively, therefore, all flesh and blood living beings are construed to legally act for a fictional entity in their fictional name,  thereby (legally) forbidden recourse to the natural realm, their unalienable rights, and natural law.

2 Frank van Dun, philosopher of Law, in the Netherlands, uses the phrase ‘natural person’  for what I have described as an Independent Living Being, ILB. He posits that a living human being is born of nature, is natural therefore, and is a ‘natural person’ thereby. His argument is valid, but rests entirely on using the word ‘person’ in its common every day usage understood by all. The moment the word ‘person’ bows to legal inclusion is the instant that ‘natural person’ is corrupted. Fault lies not with Creator’s natural law, but with those who pervert language for their own nefarious purposes!  

Exactly because ‘natural person’ has two opposing meanings, the term Independent Living Being, (ILB) became essential. No word remained, to describe a person born of nature, exclusive of legal trespass. 

Society: Society is a system of social positions, each with its proper function, role, duties or entitlements—its proper “legal competence.” That which we call society today is strictly ‘society by company;’ consisting of its rules, statutes, laws and codes of conduct—a legal society.  Apart from the societal organizers, the people in a society are no more than human resources, which—like other sorts of resources—have to be managed in the service of the goals set for the organization, (society). By contrast, see ‘Convivial Order’ above.


Save as defined herein, all words used in the Constitution of Man, and the Charter for the Commission of Justice shall be those used in the “Webster” or “Oxford” dictionaries. Those used in Legalese or in Law Dictionaries are expressly excluded as redundant, unless not found in the “Webster” or “Oxford” dictionaries.

Caution is advised: Today’s (english) language and vocabulary has been twisted, polluted and distorted beyond sensible, logical and lawful comprehension; through poisonous philosopies and theologies, political correctness, legalese and mental corrosion caused by unchallenged beliefs. Electronic communications, such as texting abbreviations, have compounded these errors such that ’near enough is good enough,’ whence laziness and apathy forbid enquiry, thereby exacting a devastating toll on critical thinking, understanding and communication. Three examples are…

‘Do you understand?‘ in a law court means, ‘Do you stand under my authority?’ 

‘Ego,’ is a meaningless abbreviation. It fails to define whether one refers to Egostist or Egoism, whose meanings are vastly different.

Selfish: Prior 1940 thereabouts, ‘selfish’ meant ‘concern with one’s own interests.’ Today it means ‘concern with one’s own interests at the expense of others.’ Moral import was added.

Copyright World Wide © All Rights Reserved – Refer to “Copyrights

Top of page:


© Ken Bartle 2016